Dragonborn talk:Sandbox

Proposed Deletion

Opposing the prod based on the same logic applied to retaining this page. —Legoless (talk) 13:57, 1 March 2020 (GMT)

It will be even useful to test out how stuff behaves with the Dragonborn: prefix. --Alfwyn (talk) 14:06, 1 March 2020 (GMT)

This sandbox is unnecessary. Even though the namespace still technically exists, it is only with grandfathered redirect pages. No new pages will ever need to be created in this namespace. All the current pages will ever need to be changed on is their redirect categories, but an entire sandbox is not at all necessary for that. Mindtrait0r (talk) 17:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Don't see any harm in having it all the same. A lot of namespace-specific sandboxes are possibly unnecessary, but they exist for testing. Can't see any point in proposing the deletion of technical pages. —⁠Legoless (talk) 09:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

In this case it is possible for someone to come across this sandbox and use it to make a Dragonborn namespace page, which is bad, since the namespace is retired. It is an unlikely scenario, very unlikely, but it doesn't need to be possible at all since the page serves no use. Mindtrait0r (talk) 20:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)